'Marriage Protection' an unnecessary burden
"By
creating only one type of
recognized relationship,
Amendment 2 could take away
existing rights and benefits
from many Floridians, gay or
straight. If it passes,
unmarried Floridians in
committed relationships --
especially seniors who may
remain unmarried by choice --
could lose their ability to
share healthcare coverage. They
could be barred from visiting
each other in emergency medical
situations" - Former U.S.
Rep. Jim Davis
_________________________________________________________________________
Bill banning domestic partnerships betrays conservative values
It
is mean-spirited to say that
loving, committed couples who
rely on each other financially
should be denied access to see
one another during an emergency
or illness at a hospital. It is
mean-spirited to deny a few
dollars savings on a "family
pass" to a public facility to a
couple who rely on each other in
every way as a committed couple;
who pay taxes and contribute to
their community.
